Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"optional" mqtt support in 'main' does not appear to be optional #632

Closed
immauss opened this issue Nov 18, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

"optional" mqtt support in 'main' does not appear to be optional #632

immauss opened this issue Nov 18, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@immauss
Copy link

immauss commented Nov 18, 2021

The mqtt support is listed as optional in the INSTALLmd, but I can't seem to find a way to build gvm-libs without it.

Expected behavior

Able to not build 'optional' components.

Actual behavior

Builds fail with out the dependency and the dependency is not easily located or part of the stated build environment for the rest of GVM.

Steps to reproduce

@immauss immauss added the bug label Nov 18, 2021
@bjoernricks
Copy link
Contributor

Are you trying to build the main branch? mqtt should not be included in the stable and oldstable branches. For main it is actually required.

@immauss
Copy link
Author

immauss commented Nov 22, 2021

yes. trying to build from main.
Thanks.

@immauss immauss closed this as completed Nov 22, 2021
@bjoernricks
Copy link
Contributor

You should really not build from main. It is our development branch and may break everytime.

@immauss
Copy link
Author

immauss commented Nov 22, 2021

Yes. I know.....
I had a specific goal in mind. I was trying to get as far as I could without opening a ticket here for it, but I'm probably going to need to anyway as I'm not having any success. I mentioned it earlier in the forums, but openvas 21.4.3 is segfaulting when I run it in a container. At some point, someone told me they had used the stable build of openvas with my container and it did not segfault, but I did not see the same, so I was trying to go down the path of getting the entire thing built on stable vs release to see if it worked out, but no luck. I'll try to gather as much data as I can before I open the issue.

Thanks,
Scott

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants