Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing rationale / mission statement #28

Closed
FrankyBoy opened this issue Nov 21, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

missing rationale / mission statement #28

FrankyBoy opened this issue Nov 21, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@FrankyBoy
Copy link

title says it all - there is absolutely no easy-to-find mission statement or rationale why this project exists and what it wants to achieve. I know I read something somewhere about less context-switches and bla but cant find it again -> if this was in the README it would greatly help.

@gregkh
Copy link
Owner

gregkh commented Nov 22, 2014

rational / mission statement is the 000 message when posted to the linux-kernel mailing list, see the email posts there if you are curious about it.. Doesn't need to be here in this repo.

@gregkh gregkh closed this as completed Nov 22, 2014
@FrankyBoy
Copy link
Author

Which is(are?) not linked anywhere ... great findability ... NOT!

@gmacario
Copy link

I believe @gregkh refers to this post which I found with a simple Google search...

@FrankyBoy
Copy link
Author

First: thanks for the link :)

I know this is a kind of personal view, but I prefer to get both the "what" as well as the "why" when visiting any project's github (or google code if you insist) page ;)

Amending the README with a "Why we do this: [link]" would be 100% sufficient.

@gregkh
Copy link
Owner

gregkh commented Nov 22, 2014

This repo is not to try to sell you on the project, to get you to use it, or anything else other than a nice place to be able to pull the code from, if you want to use it, or to provide any type of marketing materials for the feature. Heck, it's not even the main repo for it, it's always out of date by a week or so. I wouldn't recommend using this repo for anything, stick to the patches that are posted to the linux-kernel mailing list, that's the canonical version to use.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants