Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

voting dialog: reorder columns (to see fast important info) #436

Closed
Erkan-Yilmaz opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

voting dialog: reorder columns (to see fast important info) #436

Erkan-Yilmaz opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@Erkan-Yilmaz
Copy link
Contributor

Erkan-Yilmaz commented Jul 13, 2017

implementation effort: less
gain: much

Personally I want to see each time I open the dialog what has changed since my last visit:

could be realized with moving some of these around:

  1. normally the "Title" column and "Question" column say the same, so one of them also should go to the end
  2. so to speak: "share type" is irrelevant for voters
  3. the column "Answers" is not relevant as much for me as the "Best answer" column, so move it to end (at the most right position)

linux dialog, version 3.5.9.2

@denravonska
Copy link
Member

I agree that the columns need some serious cleaning up. @skcin Should we do some house cleaning in your dialog -> tab branch?

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Member

It is easy to remove and add fields. The difficult part is what fields to keep, order and size.

@Erkan-Yilmaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

see pic here: this is how I'd personally prefer it

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Member

I write it here in text:

  1. time left (auto-scaled to day/week/month/minute)
  2. poll title (*1)
  3. popular option
  4. percent of shares for popular option
  5. count of voters (*2)
  6. average vote share (*3)
  7. total shares (auto scaled to k/M/G)

Note *1) we also have poll question, but I agree that it should be sightly longer explanation of the poll and shown only when viewing poll details/voting.
Note *2) This will be difficult or manipulable for balance only polls
Note *3) I don't see how this field is important

@Erkan-Yilmaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Erkan-Yilmaz commented Jul 16, 2017

thx @tomasbrod

the idea for "average vote share (*3)" / "total shares per voters" was:

  • if more people with high shares voted in that poll, or vice versa

@skcin
Copy link
Contributor

skcin commented Jul 20, 2017

@denravonska ok, we can put the changes in that branch

@skcin
Copy link
Contributor

skcin commented Aug 17, 2017

I think I will put this in the #517 PR too, making a big UI overhaul.

@skcin skcin mentioned this issue Aug 18, 2017
@denravonska
Copy link
Member

Fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants