Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request Shapeshift integrate GRC #33

Closed
skcin opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Request Shapeshift integrate GRC #33

skcin opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@skcin
Copy link
Collaborator

skcin commented Sep 22, 2017

Issue by Erkan-Yilmaz
Sunday Jan 22, 2017 at 01:13 GMT
Originally opened as Erkan-Yilmaz/Gridcoin-tasks#31


@grctest : "Despite Coinami's help, the continued response from ShapeShift is that Gridcoin is on a 'discovery list' and that they are not looking to add further coins in 2017, how disappointing."

  • unless we get liquidity up ?
  • anyways, people should contact them (tweets, email, ...) to bring attention to this

mentioned in hangout 22:

related: #24

@skcin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skcin commented Sep 22, 2017

Comment by grctest
Sunday Jan 22, 2017 at 15:35 GMT


If we had ShapeShift support, it would result in being able to spend GRC on Purse.IO too.

@skcin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skcin commented Sep 22, 2017

Comment by Erkan-Yilmaz
Wednesday Mar 22, 2017 at 09:52 GMT


Shapeshift adds Golem https://twitter.com/customminer/status/844470613553156097

@skcin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skcin commented Sep 22, 2017

Comment by MrControl
Friday Aug 04, 2017 at 22:34 GMT


https://twitter.com/ShapeShift_io/status/890604002399989761

Several new coins have been added over the last week or so, but there is no news about GRC. Should we start a "letter campaign" of some sort as a community?

@grctest grctest changed the title make Shapeshift accept GRC Request Shapeshift integrate GRC Sep 24, 2017
@grctest
Copy link
Contributor

grctest commented Sep 24, 2017

Further requests to shapeshift will likely yield the same canned response, but it's worth a shot to continuously bug them for integration.

@jring-o jring-o closed this as completed Oct 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants