-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aggregated buckets do not match eachother. #123
Comments
has this happened always, or is this since recent version(s)? |
I have only tied with carbon-c-relay v0.44 (38fac7) So the config would create new metrics as follows: The graphed dataset is essentially: |
consolidateBy(x,sum) => should mean per graph pixel do sum iso average (not sure what it does for a grafana/json graph) The relay config will generate sums for 10-second buckets, so you should get something which is a sum of a sum for 6 buckets. What do you expect, and what do you see? |
I expected the values to be all the same for each of the generated metrics. I am starting to wonder if this is not a bug here but in go-carbon I use to persist and update the whisper files. Like I said earlier the archives are 10s:1m, 1m:2y. I wonder if having values in cache when updating is the problem. I will ask over there. I just setup another aggregation like this to a whisper store with only one archive 1m:2y and values were identical. I am going to pursue this question over there. Thanks for your time. |
If you need anything, please let me know, I'm interested in getting to the bottom of this. |
I am trying to verify my data is correct so I have some aggregations setup like this:
When I try to validate the aggregations they give me graphs like this:
I am already using consolidateBy(sum) and scaleToSeconds(60) to match the data store but this data is still not equal like I would expect from the aggregation. Storage is setup with retention of 10s:1m, 1m:2y
Any ideas why this data may not be correct?
One last thought is that each datapoint comes in with a value of 1 so each aggregation combines that number of points.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: