Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with interpreting Patient Mix #55

Open
gsharma007 opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Issue with interpreting Patient Mix #55

gsharma007 opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@gsharma007
Copy link
Owner

Understanding:

  1. The good patient will have less variability around mean and will always be around target yield i.e. responding well to the therapy.
  2. The average patient will have slightly more variability than the good patient and responding decently to the therapy.
  3. The bad patient will have a lot of variabilities and is likely to be away from the Ybar.

Possibilities:
a) We assign time from the yield curve and call it Ybar. Then based on the type of patient and defined variability, calculate the final yield value around Ybar.
b) We assign time from the yield curve and call is Y_measured because it may not be Ybar. Then based on the type of patient and defined variability, calculate the final yield value around Y_measured.

Note: Only thing is to make sure is, anyhow we should have Y_measured more than the Ybar in 90% of the cases.

@gsharma007 gsharma007 added the question Further information is requested label Jun 12, 2020
@gsharma007 gsharma007 self-assigned this Jun 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant