You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Quality scores are log10(likelihood of ref/likelihood of nonref) (right?).
To prevent misinterpretations, the documentation should make it clear that a quality score of 1 is equivalent to the ref being having 10 times the likelihood of nonref, and a quality score of 4 means 10000 times.
This is different from the standard quality score scalings in which these situations would result in scores of 10 and 40.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Quality scores are log10(likelihood of ref/likelihood of nonref) (right?).
To prevent misinterpretations, the documentation should make it clear that a quality score of 1 is equivalent to the ref being having 10 times the likelihood of nonref, and a quality score of 4 means 10000 times.
This is different from the standard quality score scalings in which these situations would result in scores of 10 and 40.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: