You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a particular reason for the logging format of the lesstest? I was wondering if we can change it to follow the Automake simple test format? For example instead of:
TEST version.c.lt
OK version.c (38 steps)
we could have:
PASS: version.c
This would be helpful for Yocto integration, because Yocto uses ptest for running tests and it uses the Automake simple test format to unify tests output.
As a work around in the Yocto integration we can still write a wrapper script to get the appropriate format, but having it merged here would be easier and can be beneficial for other project as well.
What do you think? I can do a PR if this is something you would accept.
Best
Julien
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a particular reason for the logging format of the lesstest? I was wondering if we can change it to follow the Automake simple test format? For example instead of:
we could have:
This would be helpful for Yocto integration, because Yocto uses ptest for running tests and it uses the Automake simple test format to unify tests output.
As a work around in the Yocto integration we can still write a wrapper script to get the appropriate format, but having it merged here would be easier and can be beneficial for other project as well.
What do you think? I can do a PR if this is something you would accept.
Best
Julien
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: