Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix language regarding equivalence classes #17

Open
camall3n opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Fix language regarding equivalence classes #17

camall3n opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
writing The writing needs to be updated

Comments

@camall3n
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewer feedback:

The equivalence class part might not actually be useful. Do you have an ablation?

May just be a storytelling issue. Rather than say “we merge the operators” which conveys that you get an operator as the result, maybe say we're collecting operators of the same "effects" for the purposes of backwards reasoning (or something to that effect)
@camall3n camall3n added the writing The writing needs to be updated label Aug 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
writing The writing needs to be updated
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@camall3n