New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some questions about the performance in the paper and training details. #3
Comments
Hi, thanks for the complete report on the issue. A few explanations points.
Hope these explanations helped you. Please expect some changes to our codebase by early Feburary. There are a few small bugs with the code we released that will be fixed as well. Please let us know if you happen to see any other inconsistencies... |
@hamedrab Thanks for your reply, looking forward to the new version! |
@hamedrab thanks to your great dataset, I am so interested in your work. when does the version used in paper of your dataset come out? |
I am also looking forward to your update ...My training test result:
|
Hi, thank you for open source! I executed
train_base.py
and have some questions as follows:train_base.py
I executed
train_base.py
and record the results as follows:I noticed my GMF's NDCG@10 is far higher than that in the paper, and the rest 5 values are far lower. I did not change the content in
train_base.py
, what should I do to reproduce the models in the paper.I hope you can reply to these questions that puzzle me when you have time, thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: