Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flow Propagation in GMFlow (CVPR22) vs Flow Field Deformation in LiteFlowNet3 (ECCV20) #7

Closed
twhui opened this issue Jun 30, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@twhui
Copy link

twhui commented Jun 30, 2022

Congratulations on your new work!

I think the idea of flow propagation in GMFlow is similar to the flow field deformation in LiteFlowNet3. Both of us propagate flow predictions and measure feature self-similarity. However, LiteFlowNet3 was not cited in GMFlow.

@haofeixu
Copy link
Owner

Hi @twhui , thank you for bringing the flow field deformation in LiteFlowNet3 to our attention, sorry that we are not aware of this approach while working on our GMFlow project.

Actually, our flow propagation was inspired by the GMA (ICCV 2021) paper, as we have mentioned in our paper. However, I do agree that our high-level idea is similar after checking the LiteFlowNet3 paper despite some difference in implementations. Unfortunately the CVPR camera ready deadline has passed, but I will add LiteFlowNet3 in our extended paper in future. Thanks and wish all the best!

@twhui
Copy link
Author

twhui commented Jun 30, 2022

Hi Haofei, I think you can cite LiteFlowNet3 in your updated arxiv version (https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13680). Do you think this is possible?

@haofeixu
Copy link
Owner

Hi @twhui ,

FYI, I have referenced LiteFlowNet3 in our updated arxiv paper.

@twhui
Copy link
Author

twhui commented Jul 19, 2022

Thank you.

@twhui twhui closed this as completed Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants