You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've heard that Chai will be going away in the next version, but it's things like this that make Lab really hard to use, and also what I meant by my tweet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.
lockbot
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
non issueIssue is not a problem or requires changes
Okay, so, here's a nice one that stumped me for a while, and caught someone else as well:
Given the code in this Gist: https://gist.github.com/miksago/d28d3a9491c9dbb9f663
I get the output:
I couldn't work out why Lab thought that I didn't have good code coverage. It was only when
\malex\
in the IRC channel pointed out that it's actually:In the test case.
I've heard that Chai will be going away in the next version, but it's things like this that make Lab really hard to use, and also what I meant by my tweet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: