Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison with npm outdated #16

Open
cvillerm opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Comparison with npm outdated #16

cvillerm opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@cvillerm
Copy link

This isn't really an issue, but I think that it would be good to compare this package with the standard npm outdated -l command. Something else worth positioning as a comparison would be npm shrinkwrap as a way to lock dependencies (e.g. in a CI context, to ensure that all dependencies are locked).

This would help and figure out the added value of this package.

Thanks

@scherroman
Copy link

scherroman commented Jul 3, 2019

One very valuable thing is the -ci option, which returns a failure if there is a mismatch between the currently installed node modules and expected/wanted version in package.json.

Not everyone has CI set up for fresher projects, and ensuring the app cannot run locally for development or be published if expected/wanted package versions are not met is not only useful for new developers getting a reproducible build (Pinning versions with == and package-lock.json already ensure this), but for developers who haven't worked on the project for some time, and who have no idea they need to update their packages to the latest version in package.json if they are still able to run the project and don't see any immediate issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants