Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running drugz in drugz-mean mode #8

Closed
mjafin opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Running drugz in drugz-mean mode #8

mjafin opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@mjafin
Copy link

mjafin commented Nov 21, 2019

Hi there,
Thanks for releasing drugz, greatly appreciated.

I have some instances where e.g. one of the treatments or controls is missing. In the paper you stated the paired-sample approach does not appear to offer significant benefits over an unpaired approach: when taking the mean fold change across experimental samples and comparing it to the mean fold change across control samples (Additional file 1: Figure S4A), the results are nearly identical to analysis of three paired samples

I was wondering if there was a way to enable drugz-mean when the number of controls doesn't equal the number of treated samples, to keep my pipeline tidier (i.e. not having to resort to other algorithms)?

Best regards,
Miika

@mcolic
Copy link
Contributor

mcolic commented Dec 20, 2019

Hi Miika,

You can use -unpaired flag to run drugZ in an unpaired approach.
Hope this helps.
Let me know if you have any further questions, or need further assistance.

Best,
Medina

@mcolic mcolic closed this as completed Dec 20, 2019
@mjafin
Copy link
Author

mjafin commented Dec 21, 2019

@mcolic Thanks for the reply and adding support for the unpaired approach, much appreciated!

Best wishes,
Miika

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants