Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about Caltech dataset #5

Closed
zsyawn opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Question about Caltech dataset #5

zsyawn opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@zsyawn
Copy link

zsyawn commented Apr 12, 2020

Hello Doctor, I have a question to ask you, when evaluating the Caltech dataset, you are using the Caltech new annotaions provided by Shanshan Zhang, The format is .txt, and the caltech matlab evalutation tool uses the original annotations and the format is .vbb, so how can I use this new annotation for Evaluation? I need your help, thank you very much!

@hasanirtiza
Copy link
Owner

Yes, we use the new annotations for training. We have added the details on how to evaluate on Caltech along with the Matlab evaluation code here. In the evaluation code, for the reasonable setting, you do not require annotations for the test set, as they are already contained in the package. Follow the instructions in Datasets-PreProcessing.md.

@zsyawn
Copy link
Author

zsyawn commented Apr 13, 2020

@hasanirtiza For caltech datasets,how to evalute the results on ALL set and Heavy Occlusion set? We only have one ground truth file named gt-Reasonable.mat in Eval_caltech.

@hasanirtiza
Copy link
Owner

You can generate all gt-files from the annotations of Caltech. Nonetheless, we have added now gt-Reasonable, gt-Occ=heavy and gt-All in the repo. We have also updated gt-Reasonable (new annotations by Shanshan). By default, dbEval.m will evaluate on reasonable subset. In order to evaluate any other subset, on line 52 of dbEval.m you need to add this line to evaluate say on occ=heavy :
exps = exps(9);

@zsyawn
Copy link
Author

zsyawn commented Apr 13, 2020

Thank you very much for your answer, it is very helpful to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants