Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dogechain.info extraction issues #3869

Open
PenguinKeeper7 opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3871
Open

dogechain.info extraction issues #3869

PenguinKeeper7 opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #3871

Comments

@PenguinKeeper7
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the issue
The current dogechain.info module added in #3746 doesn't have an extraction script, meaning people have to format the hash manually as $dogechain$0*iterations*payload*salt. As well as this, the current module demands exactly 320 character payloads, while real-world payloads can be any length so either handling this through the extraction script or updating the module would be highly UX-friendly. Its currently unknown if it's possible for payloads to be less than 320 characters.

Important note: There are 2 known formats, the newest being: #3868 and the older format: #3746, -m 32500 is the older format. At the time of writing, there is no new format module,

@ventaquil ventaquil linked a pull request Sep 10, 2023 that will close this issue
@ventaquil
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @PenguinKeeper7

Can you provide old wallet file (or test my extraction script on your own)?

@PenguinKeeper7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you provide old wallet file (or test my extraction script on your own)?

It's an issue passed from a support request, it's not mine so unfortunately I don't have an old file to test, also it should be dogechain, not dogecoin.

@ventaquil
Copy link
Contributor

also it should be dogechain, not dogecoin.

Done 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants