Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: fix kill_timeout validation when progress_deadline is 0 #17342

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 1, 2023

Conversation

lgfa29
Copy link
Contributor

@lgfa29 lgfa29 commented May 29, 2023

Fixes the validation for kill_timeout when progress_deadline is set to 0, which is a special case that should not be validated.

Closes #17335

@lgfa29 lgfa29 added backport/1.3.x backport to 1.3.x release line backport/1.4.x backport to 1.4.x release line backport/1.5.x backport to 1.5.x release line labels May 29, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jrasell jrasell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a minor comment change.

@@ -6831,12 +6831,13 @@ func (tg *TaskGroup) Validate(j *Job) error {

// Validate the group's Update Strategy does not conflict with the Task's kill_timeout for service type jobs
if isTypeService && tg.Update != nil {
if task.KillTimeout > tg.Update.ProgressDeadline {
// progress_deadline = 0 has a special meaning show it should not
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// progress_deadline = 0 has a special meaning show it should not
// progress_deadline = 0 has a special meaning, so it should not be

@lgfa29 lgfa29 merged commit 0ede6ac into main Jun 1, 2023
4 of 9 checks passed
@lgfa29 lgfa29 deleted the b-fix-kill-timeout-validation branch June 1, 2023 23:01
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". The test assertions are otherwise left untouched.
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: #19076
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: #19076
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: #19076
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: #19076

Co-authored-by: Tim Gross <tgross@hashicorp.com>
tgross added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of #17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: #19076

Co-authored-by: Tim Gross <tgross@hashicorp.com>
nvanthao pushed a commit to nvanthao/nomad that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of hashicorp#17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: hashicorp#19076
nvanthao pushed a commit to nvanthao/nomad that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
The E2E test suite for rescheduling had a few bugs:
* Using the command line to stop a job with a failing deployment returns a non-zero exit
  code, which would cause an otherwise passing test to fail.
* Two of the input jobs were actually invalid but were only correctly detected
  as such because of hashicorp#17342

This changeset also updates the whole test suite to move it off the v1
"framework". A few test assertions are also de-flaked.

Fixes: hashicorp#19076
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/1.3.x backport to 1.3.x release line backport/1.4.x backport to 1.4.x release line backport/1.5.x backport to 1.5.x release line
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

progress_deadline set to 0 fails to validate
2 participants