-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for http_interface
#245
Comments
http_interface
Upon further investigation, I believe that both options are present but simply being ignored. In my test environment I have a Ubuntu 20 VM which has an address of The |
A bit of further investigation.
Meanwhile, |
Closed in favor of bug #247 |
Community Note
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
Description
Some providers support
http_interface
in addition to the otherhttp_
options. This is desirable functionality.Use Case(s)
Packer is being run on disparate machines with multiple non-loopback interfaces that do not have static IPs, making use of
http_bind_address
cumbersome.In particular this would be useful for users running packer on a machine that is sometimes on-prem and connected directly to the corporate network, and at other times is off-prem and connecting with a VPN tunnel.
Using
http_bind_address
as a workaround does work, but it's more cumbersome to look up your dynamic address each time than to simply enter the easy to remember name of the appropriate interface.Potential configuration
As in existing plugins that support the feature
Potential References
hashicorp/packer#10168
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: