Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r/aws_autoscaling_lifecycle_hook: Add plan time validation for aws_autoscaling_lifecycle_hook #12145

Merged

Conversation

jphuynh
Copy link
Contributor

@jphuynh jphuynh commented Feb 24, 2020

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Release note for CHANGELOG:

resource/aws_autoscaling_lifecycle_hook: Add plan time validation for `aws_autoscaling_lifecycle_hook`

Output from acceptance testing:

==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
=== CONT  TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_basic (208.25s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult (208.25s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	208.295s

...

@jphuynh jphuynh requested a review from a team February 24, 2020 16:01
@ghost ghost added size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. service/autoscaling Issues and PRs that pertain to the autoscaling service. labels Feb 24, 2020
@bflad bflad added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Mar 3, 2020
Noticed that when trying to set a value lower than 30 seconds and got rejected at during `terraform apply`. Adding that to nicely fail during `terraform plan` when that happens.

This is not documented in [ec2/APIReference/API_LifecycleHook](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/ec2/APIReference/API_LifecycleHook.html) but can be found in the [Autoscaling user guide](https://github.com/awsdocs/amazon-ec2-auto-scaling-user-guide/blob/master/doc_source/lifecycle-hooks.md#add-lifecycle-hooks-console)
@jphuynh jphuynh force-pushed the add-autoscaling-lifecycle-hook-validations branch from 06e813f to 33b9cc4 Compare August 22, 2020 16:01
@jphuynh
Copy link
Contributor Author

jphuynh commented Aug 22, 2020

Rebased to use TF SDKv2

Base automatically changed from master to main January 23, 2021 00:57
@breathingdust breathingdust requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2021 00:57
@jphuynh
Copy link
Contributor Author

jphuynh commented Mar 30, 2021

Do you think there is a chance this one gets a review @breathingdust ? :)

@breathingdust
Copy link
Member

Hi @jphuynh! Thanks for the contribution. 🚀 We typically tackle PR's in order of community support (via reactions). That said we often can get smaller PR's like this in our internal gardening days, so hopefully we can get this one in then.

@zhelding
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding.

Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single aws directory to a large number of separate directories in internal/service, each corresponding to a particular AWS service. This separation of code has also allowed for us to simplify the names of underlying functions -- while still avoiding namespace collisions.

We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author.

For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000.

For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide.

Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook\|TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic\|TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple\|TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_' PKG=autoscaling ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=2 
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/autoscaling/... -v -count 1 -parallel 2  -run=TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook\|TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic\|TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple\|TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingGroup_basic (58.93s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_basic (160.89s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_omitDefaultResult (165.11s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingLifecycleHook_disappears (141.03s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingGroup_initialLifecycleHook (493.86s)
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingGroup_simple (226.85s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/autoscaling        699.631s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@jphuynh Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit 978349a into hashicorp:main Nov 6, 2023
33 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.25.0 milestone Nov 6, 2023
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.25.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/autoscaling Issues and PRs that pertain to the autoscaling service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants