Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r/redshift_resource_policy - new resource #34149

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 commented Oct 28, 2023

Description

Relations

Closes #34138

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_  PKG=redshift 
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_basic (371.39s)

<!---
See what makes a good Pull Request at: https://hashicorp.github.io/terraform-provider-aws/raising-a-pull-request/
--->
### Description
<!---
Please provide a helpful description of what change this pull request will introduce.
--->

### Relations
<!---
If your pull request fully resolves and should automatically close the linked issue, use Closes. Otherwise, use Relates.

For Example:

Relates #0000
or
Closes #0000
--->

Closes hashicorp#34138

### References
<!---
Optionally, provide any helpful references that may help the reviewer(s).
--->

### Output from Acceptance Testing
<!--
Replace TestAccXXX with a pattern that matches the tests affected by this PR.

Replace ec2 with the service package corresponding to your tests.

For more information on the `-run` flag, see the `go test` documentation at https://tip.golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Testing_flags.
-->

```console
%  make testacc TESTS=TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_  PKG=redshift

...
```
@github-actions
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. service/redshift Issues and PRs that pertain to the redshift service. generators Relates to code generators. labels Oct 28, 2023
@terraform-aws-provider terraform-aws-provider bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. external-maintainer Contribution from a trusted external contributor. labels Oct 28, 2023
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 added new-resource Introduces a new resource. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Oct 28, 2023
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2023 23:30
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_' PKG=redshift ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=2
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/redshift/... -v -count 1 -parallel 2  -run=TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_disappears (249.44s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftResourcePolicy_basic (286.01s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/redshift	291.459s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@DrFaust92 Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit b1b18e9 into hashicorp:main Nov 1, 2023
51 of 52 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.24.0 milestone Nov 1, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2023

This functionality has been released in v5.24.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. external-maintainer Contribution from a trusted external contributor. generators Relates to code generators. new-resource Introduces a new resource. service/redshift Issues and PRs that pertain to the redshift service. size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[New Resource]: aws_redshift_resource_policy
2 participants