[New Resource]: aws_redshift_data_share_consumer_association

[jar-b]

Description

This resource will allow practitioners to manage Redshift data share consumer associations via Terraform.

Also fixes a bug in the aws_redshift_data_share_authorization data source that incorrectly handled an ACTIVE data share status, causing persistent differences and forced re-creation of the resource.

Relations

Closes #33454
Relates #35703

References

• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/APIReference/API_AssociateDataShareConsumer.html
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/APIReference/API_DisassociateDataShareConsumer.html
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/APIReference/API_DescribeDataShares.html

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc PKG=redshift TESTS=TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/redshift/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_'  -timeout 360m

--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_associateEntireAccount (294.14s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_disappears (312.61s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_basic (355.38s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/redshift   362.372s

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[github-actions]

Thank you for your contribution! 🚀

A new usage of AWS SDK for Go V1 was detected. Please prefer AWS SDK for Go V2 for all net-new services. If this is an enhancement or bug fix to an existing AWS SDK Go V1 based resource, this comment can be safely ignored.

For additional information refer to the AWS SDK for Go Versions page in the contributor guide.

[ewbankkit]

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_' PKG=redshift
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/redshift/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_associateEntireAccount
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_associateEntireAccount
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_associateEntireAccount
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_associateEntireAccount (334.16s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_basic (354.32s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftDataShareConsumerAssociation_disappears (371.05s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/redshift	381.954s

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.37.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.