Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add azurerm_nginx_certificate data source #24577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

puneetsarna
Copy link
Contributor

terraform-provider-azurerm $ make acctests SERVICE="nginx" TESTARGS="-run=TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
==> Checking that Custom Timeouts are used...
==> Checking that acceptance test packages are used...
TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/nginx -run=TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic -timeout 180m -ldflags="-X=github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN   TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccNginxCertificateDataSource_basic (626.47s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/nginx	629.577s

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @puneetsarna.

I left a few minor comments that should be fixed up for consistency across the provider. Once that's done we can run the tests and this should be good to go!

}
deploymentId, err := nginxdeployment.ParseNginxDeploymentID(model.NginxDeploymentId)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error parsing NGINX deployment ID %s: %+v", deploymentId, err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error returned by the parsing function already contains the information we need. We don't need to wrap it further.

Suggested change
return fmt.Errorf("error parsing NGINX deployment ID %s: %+v", deploymentId, err)
return err

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 made the change.

if response.WasNotFound(result.HttpResponse) {
return fmt.Errorf("%s was not found", id)
}
return fmt.Errorf("reading %s: %+v", id, err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return fmt.Errorf("reading %s: %+v", id, err)
return fmt.Errorf("retrieving %s: %+v", id, err)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done 👍

Comment on lines 109 to 111
output.KeyVirtualPath = pointer.ToString(prop.KeyVirtualPath)
output.KeyVaultSecretId = pointer.ToString(prop.KeyVaultSecretId)
output.CertificateVirtualPath = pointer.ToString(prop.CertificateVirtualPath)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should be using the generic pointer.From here and not .ToString

Suggested change
output.KeyVirtualPath = pointer.ToString(prop.KeyVirtualPath)
output.KeyVaultSecretId = pointer.ToString(prop.KeyVaultSecretId)
output.CertificateVirtualPath = pointer.ToString(prop.CertificateVirtualPath)
output.KeyVirtualPath = pointer.From(prop.KeyVirtualPath)
output.KeyVaultSecretId = pointer.From(prop.KeyVaultSecretId)
output.CertificateVirtualPath = pointer.From(prop.CertificateVirtualPath)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 made the change.


* `id` - The ID of the Nginx Certificate.

* `certificate_virtual_path` - The path to the cert file of this certificate.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* `certificate_virtual_path` - The path to the cert file of this certificate.
* `certificate_virtual_path` - The path to the certificate file of this certificate.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 made the change.

@puneetsarna
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stephybun Thank you for the review. I have made the suggested changes and have rerun the acceptance test as well.

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @puneetsarna LGTM 🍕

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 396e518 into hashicorp:main Jan 23, 2024
37 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.89.0 milestone Jan 23, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.89.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

dduportal added a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.88.0&#34; to &#34;3.89.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.89.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.89.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
New Data Source: `azurerm_data_factory_trigger_schedule`
([#24572](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24572))&#xA;*
New Data Source: `azurerm_data_factory_trigger_schedules`
([#24572](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24572))&#xA;*
New Data Source: `azurerm_ip_groups`
([#24540](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24540))&#xA;*
New Data Source: `azurerm_nginx_certificate`
([#24577](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24577))&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_chaos_studio_target`
([#24580](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24580))&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_elastic_san_volume_group`
([#24166](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24166))&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_netapp_account_encryption`
([#23733](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23733))&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_redhat_openshift_cluster`
([#24375](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24375))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.66.1` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers`
([#24561](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24561))&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240124.1115501` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24619](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24619))&#xA;*
`bot`: updating to API Version `2021-05-01-preview`
([#24555](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24555))&#xA;*
`containerservice`: the SDK Clients now support logging
([#24564](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24564))&#xA;*
`cosmosdb`: updating to API Version `2023-04-15`
([#24541](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24541))&#xA;*
`loadtestservice`: updating to use the base layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest` (and support
logging)
([#24578](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24578))&#xA;*
`managedidentity`: updating to use the base layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest` (and support
logging)
([#24578](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24578))&#xA;*
`azurerm_api_management_api` - change the `id` format so specific
`revision`s can be managed by Terraform
([#23031](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23031))&#xA;*
`azurerm_data_protection_backup_vault` - the `redundancy` propety can
now be set to `ZoneRedundant`
([#24556](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24556))&#xA;*
`azurerm_data_factory_integration_runtime_azure_ssis` - support for the
`credential_name` property
([#24458](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24458))&#xA;*
`azurerm_orchestrated_virtual_machine_scale_set` - support
`2022-datacenter-azure-edition-hotpatch` and
`2022-datacenter-azure-edition-hotpatch-smalldisk` hotpatching images
([#23500](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23500))&#xA;*
`azurerm_stream_analytics_job` - support for the `sku_name` property
([#24554](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24554))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* Data Source: `azurerm_app_service` - parsing the API
Response for `app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_function_app` - parsing the API Response for
`app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_configuration_key` - the value for the `value` property can
now be removed/emptied
([#24582](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24582))&#xA;&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_service` - parsing the API Response for
`app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_service_plan` - fix casing in `serverFarms` due to ID
update
([#24562](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24562))&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_service_slot` - parsing the API Response for
`app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
`azurerm_automation_schedule` - only one `monthly_occurence` block can
now be specified
([#24614](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24614))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cognitive_deployment` - the `model.version` property is no
longer required
([#24264](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24264))&#xA;*
`azurerm_container_app` - multiple `custom_scale_rule` can not be
updated
([#24509](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24509))&#xA;*
`azurerm_container_registry_task_schedule_run_now` - prevent issue where
the incorrect scheduled run in tracked if there have been multiple
([#24592](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24592))&#xA;*
`azurerm_function_app` - parsing the API Response for
`app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
`azurerm_function_app_slot` - parsing the API Response for
`app_service_plan_id` case-insensitively
([#24626](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24626))&#xA;*
`azurerm_logic_app_standard` - now will parse the app service ID
insensitively
([#24562](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24562))&#xA;*
`azurerm_logic_app_workflow` - the `workflow_parameters` will now
correctly handle information specified by `$connections`
([#24141](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24141))&#xA;*
`azurerm_mssql_managed_instance_security_alert_policy` - can not update
empty storage attributes
([#24553](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24553))&#xA;*
`azurerm_network_interface` - the `ip_configuration` properties are no
longer added to a Load Balancer Backend if one of those
`ip_configurations` is associated with a backend
([#24470](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24470))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/terraform-jobs/job/azure/job/main/1052/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants