Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_machine_learning_compute_cluster change subnet_resource_id constraint: Respect Managed Vnet when creating compute clusters fixes #25901 #26073

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

hmrc87
Copy link
Contributor

@hmrc87 hmrc87 commented May 23, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

When a Managed Vnet Setup as described in the Microsoft documentation is used a compute cluster can have NO public IP and we don't need to provide a subnet_resource_id since this is managed by Microsoft.

I have tested this setup by creating a compute cluster via cli/sdk and also querying an existing compute cluster. I both cases the subnet_ressource_id can be / was empty/null.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.

Change Log

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #25901

@hmrc87 hmrc87 marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2024 07:46
Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @hmrc87. Although part of the code was just moved from what already existed I left a couple of suggestions on the error messages which would be good to update so that they're more consistent with the rest of the provider. We also need to add some more nil checks. Once that's been fixed up we can run the tests and see if this is ready to go!

Co-authored-by: stephybun <steph@hashicorp.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/M and removed size/S labels May 23, 2024
@hmrc87 hmrc87 requested a review from stephybun May 23, 2024 12:01
Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @hmrc87, I overlooked the removal of the import required error message. Could you add that back in? Should fix the test failure that I'm seeing.

@hmrc87
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmrc87 commented May 23, 2024

@stephybun I will fix all the linter and tests errors asap

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fantastic, thanks @hmrc87 LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 4620361 into hashicorp:main May 23, 2024
30 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.105.0 milestone May 23, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.105.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants