Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Hybrid Connections in App Service #7184

Closed
dansmitt opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for Hybrid Connections in App Service #7184

dansmitt opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@dansmitt
Copy link

dansmitt commented Jun 3, 2020

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

Hybrid Connections are used to access endpoints and resources in an other network, as described in the documentation here.

Currently, azurerm_app_service does not support adding such a hybrid connection.
It is pretty annoying, adding the hybrid connection manualy after a deployment.

Hybrid connections could be created manualy in a seperate resource group and can be referenced by name and/without namespace (depends on implementation) in the app service.

New or Affected Resource(s)

azurerm_app_service

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "azurerm_app_service" "webapp" {
  name                = "name"
  resource_group_name = "rg_name"
  location            = "West US 2"
  app_service_plan_id = azurerm_app_service_plan.sp.id

  .
  .
  .

  networking {
    hybrid_connection {
      name = "hybrid_connection_name_example"
      namespace = "namespace_example"
    }

    hybrid_connection {
      name = "hybrid_connection_name_example2"
      namespace = "namespace_example2"
    }
  }
}
@dansmitt
Copy link
Author

dansmitt commented May 4, 2021

@tombuildsstuff will this be ever implemented?

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

Fixed via #7224

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants