Some resource schemas lack field descriptions

[xiaobaitusi]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.

Description

Some resource schemas lack field descriptions, e.g ContainerCluster and ContainerNodePool.

New or Affected Resource(s)

It's ideal to have field descriptions for every resource but the following resources are complicated enough to require inline field description in schema.

• google_container_cluster (done by Edward)
• google_container_node_pool (done by Edward)
• google_sql_database_instance (claimed by Thomas)
• google_storage_bucket (claimed by Thomas)
• google_compute_instance (done by Edward)

[danawillow]

Adding google_bigtable_instance (and probably _table just for consistency) as per email conversation.

[edwardmedia]

Closing the issue as descriptions have been added to the schema in above resources.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!