New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewrite to use SQL backend #1031
Comments
Not a blocker for hackage 2 release. |
If you use the remote backend and keep an
Same solution, use the remote backend.
Also remote backend. Then you can write a
In the setup I suggested, you'd just enter ghci, grab the full state and mung it with Haskell like you would any Haskell value. One problem though, if the state is as big as you say I think it would need to be copied, over the socket, to the ghci process in full. So yea it's not perfect. Also, not sure if you're using ixset for hackage2? If not, it might've helped in that case because you could have arbitrary indexes like with an SQL database, including indexing on |
So far it's all going fine with the acid-state stuff, no current plans to change. |
Consensus currently seems to be that Hackage 2 should use an SQL database rather than acid-state.
See thread: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/2012-September/009069.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: