Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parBuffer takes longer than just using a single core. #70

Open
noahmartinwilliams opened this issue Feb 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

parBuffer takes longer than just using a single core. #70

noahmartinwilliams opened this issue Feb 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@noahmartinwilliams
Copy link

noahmartinwilliams commented Feb 24, 2024

I made this repo to demonstrate how the parallel library works, and it takes longer to use parallelism than it does to use a single core. It doesn't seem to run all threads at the same time very often according to threadscope, and I'm pretty sure it's a problem with the parallel library.

Edit: It seems if I split the password list into chunks then it runs faster with parallelism, but it still doesn't run using all cores very efficiently. This might just be a problem with my code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant