-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v1.0.9-r4: use major-major upper bounds only #82
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Optimistic strategy: assume that nothing breaks if dependencies bump their major version (unless they bump the major-major version). Breakage can then be addressed by Hackage revisions.
It would be nice to revise |
Per the README & haskell/cabal#5170 it is only necessary for Cabal < 2.4 ( 2018 ).
The examples / tests can stay on major-major bounds: this'll help detect issues earlier, on CI.
Hi @andreasabel! I've fixed the CI for GHC 9.10. We're ready for revision 4 here. (Per #79, repo transfer was done today; I'd appreciate if you let me upload the revision myself, to get practice) I'm happy with major-major bounds in the examples / tests — but in the main lib, I'm reverting to |
Looking forward to the new version release! |
@phadej could you possibly add @ulidtko to maintainers? https://hackage.haskell.org/package/cabal-doctest/maintainers/ |
Optimistic strategy: assume that nothing breaks if dependencies bump
their major version (unless they bump the major-major version).
Breakage can then be addressed by Hackage revisions.