Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for marking fields as deprecated #2695

Open
lorenzo opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Support for marking fields as deprecated #2695

lorenzo opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
a/api c/server Related to server k/enhancement New feature or improve an existing feature p/high candidate for being included in the upcoming sprint t/product-platform

Comments

@lorenzo
Copy link
Contributor

lorenzo commented Aug 8, 2019

I'm currently in the process of evaluating Hasura to sell it as a solution for the rest of may team. One of the concerns we have is that there is no. support for marking fields or tables as deprecated.

Mostly interested in just having the ability to mark them, as. we can handle fine the process of keeping the columns up to date for the time they live.

@coco98 coco98 added p/urgent Immediate action required c/server Related to server c/docs Related to docs and removed c/docs Related to docs labels Aug 8, 2019
@dsandip dsandip added p/high candidate for being included in the upcoming sprint and removed p/urgent Immediate action required labels Aug 9, 2019
@thebrianbug
Copy link

This is such an important feature. Can the community do anything to help make this happen?

@ajohnson1200 ajohnson1200 added t/product-platform k/enhancement New feature or improve an existing feature labels Dec 6, 2022
@rikbrown
Copy link

+1. This bit my team after we marked a field @deprecated and it completely disappeared from the schema. This issue needs a "Danger: Hasura will break your schema until they deal with this issue" banner.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a/api c/server Related to server k/enhancement New feature or improve an existing feature p/high candidate for being included in the upcoming sprint t/product-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants