Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add 2nd level GND typing #2

Closed
acka47 opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Add 2nd level GND typing #2

acka47 opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@ChristophEwertowski

Comments

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Jul 4, 2017 •
edited

From #1 (comment):

Furthermore, we should have a type from the second level of GND ontology attached to each resource. We will need this for facetting. GND ontology has three levels in its type hierarchy (except for Person, where we have a fourth one added). see the overview over the GND class hierarchy at https://wiki1.hbz-nrw.de/x/CIeW. In the concrete example, PlaceOrGeographicName should be in the data.
@acka47 acka47 assigned acka47 and fsteeg and unassigned acka47 Jul 4, 2017
@acka47 acka47 added the ready label Jul 4, 2017
@fsteeg fsteeg removed the ready label Jul 19, 2017
@fsteeg fsteeg mentioned this issue Aug 10, 2017
Closed
@fsteeg fsteeg added ready and removed ready labels Aug 10, 2017
fsteeg added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2017
@fsteeg
Add second level GND ontology types
fc07bea 
See #2
fsteeg added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2017
@fsteeg
Unify type handling in RDF model preprocessing
9b4235f 
See #2
@fsteeg
Copy link
Member

fsteeg commented Aug 14, 2017

Deployed to test: http://test.lobid.org/authorities/4074335-4.json

(@ChristophEwertowski: We have no production system yet, so just +1 and close if this looks good.)

@fsteeg fsteeg assigned ChristophEwertowski and unassigned fsteeg Aug 14, 2017
@fsteeg fsteeg added review and removed working labels Aug 14, 2017
@ChristophEwertowski
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@acka47 acka47 mentioned this issue Feb 26, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ChristophEwertowski ChristophEwertowski

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@fsteeg @acka47 @ChristophEwertowski