Guidelines for attachments/documents in claim.supportingInfo #90
Replies: 1 comment
-
Dear All, Kindly find below the proposal on attachment handling/document sharing as indicated in @gopi-hcx’s post above: ContextTo establish a successful long-term document exchange strategy, one should employ sophisticated mechanisms such as PHR, HIE-CM, and advanced FHIR capabilities while providing guidelines on document handling within participant systems. However, the immediate priority is to enable the use of current document management processes and encourage the adoption of better ones. This proposal provides phase 1 recommendations for exchanging claim-related supporting documents. The HCX protocol can meet the immediate requirement for document handling in the "Handling Attachment" section, but it needs further elaboration to assist integrators in implementing various scenarios such as Document Management Systems (DMS) managed by senders (primarily providers) versus receivers (primarily payers) and sharing DMS credentials with counterparties. The following sections detail the key scenarios and proposed mechanisms for each. Sender (Requester) managed DMSPre-signed URLs can be used to exchange documents between senders and receivers in a secure and efficient manner. Here's how it is envisioned to work:
Pre-signed URLs are a secure and tamper-proof method for exchanging documents between senders and receivers. The use of an authorization token ensures that only authorized individuals can access the document, and the sender can further enhance security by strategies like - limiting the number of times the document can be accessed, adding unique identifiers from the request, etc. This method is easily accessible and does not require any special software or infrastructure, as the documents can be stored in cloud-based storage services like Amazon S3 or Microsoft Azure. Additionally, pre-signed URLs can be set to expire after a specified time period, protecting the document's confidentiality and preventing access after it is no longer required. Given these benefits, pre-signed URLs are highly recommended for document sharing in HCX flows. Receiver managed DMSWhen the receiver manages the Document Management System (DMS), one of the key challenges is to share the DMS details, such as the type of DMS (http, ftp), endpoint URL, and access credentials, with the sender in a manner that allows the receiver to change the DMS details as needed. There are two ways to achieve this: Out of band DMS details sharing:This leverages existing ways of sharing Payer’s DMS details with others (Providers, TPAs, etc.) and HCX protocol doesn’t have a role to play in such sharing of DMS details. Inline DMS details sharing through HCXThis method enables the sharing of DMS details between the sender and receiver via HCX response resources in an inline manner. The organization.endpoint profiles available in various response resources such as CoverageEligibilityResponse and ClaimResponse are utilized for this purpose. Here is an overview of how the inline DMS details sharing is intended to work:
The proposed document exchange mechanism is a significant stride in enhancing the document exchange process among ecosystem participants. Although there's always room for improvement, we're confident that this mechanism will simplify the document exchange process and foster greater collaboration between stakeholders. We kindly request everyone to review the proposed mechanism and share their valuable feedback as comments in this discussion. We intend to deliberate on these suggestions in our next working group meeting. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
From the HCX Workshop Parking Lot items - Feb 2023: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1orSLpwn90HXCgGe-RsMJj7LLVyxXa-VW2dczAtut6mg/edit?usp=sharing
This has been a pending item for long. It is quite clear now that the integrators are looking for some guidelines on sending claim attachments as part of the FHIR Claim resource. FHIR has deliberately not gotten in to the depths of file sharing and access control, as it is outside its scope, it is expected that the industry come up with different ways of solving the problem according to their needs and it may be difficult to come up with a single approach that is satisfying for every participant.
So, the working group would come up with some guidelines and suggestions on the attachments could be sent in a secure and reasonably convenient way. Please participate and add your ideas.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions