You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At some point, we should replace our simple zero-dimensional transient climate response model with a two-box models for surface ocean / atmosphere and deep ocean (e.g. Held 2010). Similar for adding a two-box carbon cycle for a ocean carbon sink (e.g. Glotter 2014).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of a1ab9f5, the master branch now includes a two-box model. Dynamic carbon cycle may be implemented further down the line, but it is mathematically and conceptually much more elusive (to the general user) than the rest of the model, so it is unclear if the benefit of greater quantitative accuracy is worth the added complexity.
hdrake
changed the title
Improve physical climate model
Add dynamic carbon cycle
Mar 10, 2020
At some point, we should replace our simple zero-dimensional transient climate response model with a two-box models for surface ocean / atmosphere and deep ocean (e.g. Held 2010). Similar for adding a two-box carbon cycle for a ocean carbon sink (e.g. Glotter 2014).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: