Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we archive this repository? #78

Open
HealthyPear opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #79
Open

Should we archive this repository? #78

HealthyPear opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #79
Labels
maintenance

Comments

@HealthyPear
Copy link
Owner

As reported in cta-observatory/protopipe#201

With the advent of DataPipe and magic-cta-pipe, this project is basically obsolete.

I do not see any further development since I left my previous position.

Should we archive this repository as read-only?

@kosack
@kosack
Copy link
Collaborator

kosack commented Jun 27, 2023

Yes, I think we can archive this one. It's not really magic-cta-pipe that replaces it, but the new Dirac ProductionSystem and related workflows that nearly replaces this (though still not 100%)

@HealthyPear
Copy link
Owner Author

People can still use it, the point is that I think no one will further improve this

@HealthyPear HealthyPear linked a pull request Jun 27, 2023 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
maintenance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update README for repository archival HealthyPear/protopipe-grid-interface
2 participants
@kosack @HealthyPear