Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: LSDV-4634: Annotation instructions modal #3949

Closed

Conversation

robot-ci-heartex
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Travis1282!

This PR was created in response to a PRs in upstream repo:

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 31, 2023

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f71bc89
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/642aedb5ef81f20008bc15da

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 31, 2023

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f71bc89
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/642aedb559164700089930d8

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feat label Mar 31, 2023
@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2023 15:15
@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex enabled auto-merge (squash) April 3, 2023 15:15
@bmartel
Copy link
Contributor

bmartel commented Jun 5, 2023

@Travis1282 @juliosgarbi This may be already included through another PR, and only kept open due to some weird LD flag generation which we no longer do. Please review and ensure this is already included in develop, and close this PR stating if it is.

@hlomzik
Copy link
Collaborator

hlomzik commented Jun 5, 2023

already merged

@hlomzik hlomzik closed this Jun 5, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled June 5, 2023 22:22

Pull request was closed

@hlomzik hlomzik deleted the fb-lsdv-4634/anotation-instructions-modal branch June 6, 2023 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants