Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HIP7: Process for managing Helium Improvement Proposals #26

Closed
jamiew opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

HIP7: Process for managing Helium Improvement Proposals #26

jamiew opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor

jamiew commented Jun 10, 2020

Authors: @jamiew

Original PR: #22

Rendered view: https://github.com/helium/HIP/blob/master/0007-managing-hip-process.md

Summary from HIP:

Defines an initial process for proposing, discussing, and finalizing improvements to the Helium blockchain using Helium Improvement Proposals (HIPs).

"How a bill becomes a law"

@PaulVMo
Copy link
Contributor

PaulVMo commented Oct 21, 2020

Couple suggestions around status for HIPs:

  1. Include descriptions of all statuses, especially the difference between Draft and In Discussion which are not currently defined in the HIP but used in README.md
  2. Consider renaming Closed status to Withdrawn or Cancelled to avoid ambiguity as to what Closed means

@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor Author

jamiew commented Oct 21, 2020

Thanks @PaulVMo, will address.

I like withdrawn too although sometimes it is sort of closed due to inactivity rather than actively withdrawn.

FWIW current usage is:

  • Draft: author is still writing this and not yet formally soliciting feedback. In theory a HIP should only stay in this state for a few days or so; right now we have 3 ancient drafts still hanging out that should either be closed or merged and moved to discussion. They are slightly legacy to when only Helium Inc employees were using this repo. They all had write access, so all work just happened inside a single PR
  • DIscussion: typos were fixed, now under active consideration

@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor Author

jamiew commented Feb 8, 2022

Just testing a comment hook

@mfalkvidd
Copy link

Trying to hook up, ey? ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants