Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to compare MHMMs with different number of parameters? #40

Closed
vrodriguezf opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

How to compare MHMMs with different number of parameters? #40

vrodriguezf opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@vrodriguezf
Copy link

Hi,

I am aware of the use of BIC for comparing single HMMs with different number of parameters. How does this apply for the use of MHMMs? I mean, how can I compare models with different number of clusters, and different number of states in the HMM of each cluster?

Best!

@satuhelske
Copy link
Collaborator

Model selection of MHMMs is an open issue. Here is one (imperfect) option: https://lacosa.lives-nccr.ch/sites/lacosa.lives-nccr.ch/files/proc-lacosa2-helskehelskeeerola_paper_24.pdf

In short, this approach starts with finding preliminary clusters using sequence analysis and cluster analysis, followed by estimating separate HMMs for each cluster in a few clustering options. In other words, the number of states in each preliminary cluster is determined separately. Finally, the parameters of these separate HMMs are used as starting values in the estimation of MHMMs, keeping numbers of hidden states fixed in each cluster. The best number of clusters is determined from combining the MHMMs.

Please read the paper for more detailed information to determine whether something like this would suit your needs.

@vrodriguezf
Copy link
Author

Thanks! What section of the paper talks about this?

@helske
Copy link
Owner

helske commented May 10, 2021

Closed as old and slightly off-topic (this is more about general MHMM modelling instead of about the use of seqHMM).

In the paper linked above, section 6.2.2 discusses this issue shortly.

@helske helske closed this as completed May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants