group.md

HPCE CW6 Group Assessment

Group name : xxx

Group members (Imperial login) : aaa, bbb, ccc

Use-case	Machine (g3.4xlarge or c4.8xlarge)
Stress	xxx
Certify	xxx
Search	xxx

When asked for who is responsible for things, these are to gently steer marks where appropriate, e.g. for a particularly good idea. The change in marks is not great (at most 10% of this component), but is to at least try to assign some kind of individual weighting. Most ideas can genuinely be attributed to someone (even if they are then developed as a grop), and even if you are pair programming, there is someone who takes more of a lead.

Identify two (pairs) or three (triples) key improvements you made

Improvement :

Initial idea : (Imperial login)

Feasibility analysis : (Imperial login)

Implementation : (Imperial login)

What was the big idea?:

(at most 50 words)

Why was it expected to improve things?:

(at most 50 words)

How well did it work?:

(at most 50 words)

Identify two (pairs) or three (triples) further changes that should be made

These can include API changes, restructuring, moving to a different platform, ...

Further Change :

Initial idea : (Imperial login)

What is the big idea?:

(at most 50 words)

How difficult would it be, what would the impact be on users?

(at most 50 words)

How much of an improvment would you expect?

(at most 50 words)