Talk Proposal: HTML: The Good Parts #3

Talk title

HTML: The Good Parts

Abstract

I have two descriptions. The funny one just lists all the tags:

html, head, title, base, link, meta, style, body, article, section, nav, aside, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hgroup, header, footer, address, p, hr, pre, blockquote, ol, ul, menu, li, dl, dt, dd, figure, figcaption, main, div, a, em, strong, small, s, cite, q, dfn, abbr, ruby, rt, rp, data, time, code, var, samp, kbd, sub, sup, i, b, u, mark, bdi, bdo, span, br, wbr, ins, del, picture, source, img, iframe, embed, object, video, audio, track, map, area, table, caption, colgroup, col, tbody, thead, tfoot, tr, td, th, form, label, input, button, select, datalist, optgroup, option, textarea, output, progress, meter, fieldset, legend, details, summary, dialog, script, noscript, template, slot, canvas.

Together with the title it might be enough. If not, there’s a formal one:

The best and the most valuable parts of HTML from the practical point of view: what spec to read and how to read it, streaming and rendering in browsers, elements nesting rules and possible problems, the most critical structural and content elements, new and less known attributes, tools for validation and minification, ways to extend HTML.

Your name (and pronouns)

Vadim Makeev, he/him

Contact Details

• hi@pepelsbey.dev
• @pepelsbey_dev

Code of Conduct

• I've read and agree to the HHTML Code of Conduct