Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Talk Proposal: HTML: The Good Parts #3

Closed
1 task done
pepelsbey opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task done

Talk Proposal: HTML: The Good Parts #3

pepelsbey opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
confirmed 🎉 The talk has been confirmed Feature Talk 🎤 Feature Talk (20-25 minutes)

Comments

@pepelsbey
Copy link

Talk title

HTML: The Good Parts

Abstract

I have two descriptions. The funny one just lists all the tags:

html, head, title, base, link, meta, style, body, article, section, nav, aside, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hgroup, header, footer, address, p, hr, pre, blockquote, ol, ul, menu, li, dl, dt, dd, figure, figcaption, main, div, a, em, strong, small, s, cite, q, dfn, abbr, ruby, rt, rp, data, time, code, var, samp, kbd, sub, sup, i, b, u, mark, bdi, bdo, span, br, wbr, ins, del, picture, source, img, iframe, embed, object, video, audio, track, map, area, table, caption, colgroup, col, tbody, thead, tfoot, tr, td, th, form, label, input, button, select, datalist, optgroup, option, textarea, output, progress, meter, fieldset, legend, details, summary, dialog, script, noscript, template, slot, canvas.

Together with the title it might be enough. If not, there’s a formal one:

The best and the most valuable parts of HTML from the practical point of view: what spec to read and how to read it, streaming and rendering in browsers, elements nesting rules and possible problems, the most critical structural and content elements, new and less known attributes, tools for validation and minification, ways to extend HTML.

Your name (and pronouns)

Vadim Makeev, he/him

Contact Details

Code of Conduct

@pepelsbey pepelsbey added the Feature Talk 🎤 Feature Talk (20-25 minutes) label Oct 11, 2022
@learosema
Copy link
Contributor

Hello Vadim, I would like to confirm your talk for the next meetup scheduled on November 15, 2022.

Best regards,
Lea

@pepelsbey
Copy link
Author

@learosema thank you! I'll start preparing it. Is there are any next steps apart from joining to the call on the day?

@learosema
Copy link
Contributor

If you like, we can schedule a zoom session some time before the meetup where we can talk a bit about the meetup and test the setup. Also another question is talk order, would you like to have the first talk slot in the meetup or the second one?

@learosema learosema added the confirmed 🎉 The talk has been confirmed label Oct 16, 2022
@pepelsbey
Copy link
Author

Yes, let's have a call :) As for the schedule, it's up to you: I'm happy to take any slot.

@learosema
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you :) I have a calendly account to schedule a meeting:
https://calendly.com/learosema/60min

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
confirmed 🎉 The talk has been confirmed Feature Talk 🎤 Feature Talk (20-25 minutes)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants