You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that only complex type documentation will be considered during the generation process, which is as far as I know related to JAXB.
To solve the issue the idea was to use a binding file including javadoc entries. The binding.xjb could be generated based on the schema in a pre-build step.
Using the aforementioned approach the get methods will be documented but not the set methods. So I wonder if there is a more elegant way to transfer schema documentation during generation. Are there further configuration possibilities related to documentation in hyperjaxb3? Are there any plans to extend hyperjaxb3 in this direction?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it is the adoption of xs:documentation to JavaDoc.
I think it is more related to JAXB than Hyperjaxb3. But I'm not sure if the manipulation of the generation process via a bindings.xjb is the best solution for the following workflow.
In a project I work with hyperjaxb3 and documented schema files.
Schema sample:
I noticed that only complex type documentation will be considered during the generation process, which is as far as I know related to JAXB.
To solve the issue the idea was to use a binding file including javadoc entries. The binding.xjb could be generated based on the schema in a pre-build step.
Bindings sample:
Using the aforementioned approach the get methods will be documented but not the set methods. So I wonder if there is a more elegant way to transfer schema documentation during generation. Are there further configuration possibilities related to documentation in hyperjaxb3? Are there any plans to extend hyperjaxb3 in this direction?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: