HL7.COUNTRY.FHIR.IG\BeSpecimenLaboratory - FHIR v4.0.1 / Formal Views of Profile Content(Robin Bosman - ehealth Platform)

[hl7belgium-technicaluser]

Document	Section	Comment	Organization Name	Mail
HL7.COUNTRY.FHIR.IG\BeSpecimenLaboratory - FHIR v4.0.1	Formal Views of Profile Content	I the report we give specimen information, but some of it might be considered redundant. (for example, for certain tests, it is not considered mandatory to explicitly mention the specimen was blood.) Should this be different when specimen information is given in the order (for example, should we consider in the order it is always mandatory to give the type of the specimen?)	Robin Bosman - ehealth Platform

[RobinGroepT]

As per the 30/11 WG: unless the specimen is explicitly clear from the used LOINC code it SHALL be available in the report. This means the specimen type itself but also the other functionalities of the Specimen resource SHALL be leveraged when needed such as extra information about where the specimen was taken (e.g. taken from left or right elbow).

[bdc-ehealth]

Closed because of https://jira.smals.be/browse/EHHL-23