Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Material, Anzahl zu Analyse (Beat Heggli) #72

Open
ig-feedback opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Material, Anzahl zu Analyse (Beat Heggli) #72

ig-feedback opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Request of feature useful extensions that can be implemented in later versions STU 1 Ballot
Milestone

Comments

@ig-feedback
Copy link
Collaborator

ch.fhir.ig.ch-lab-order#0.1.0 /

Die Art des Materials erwarten wir eigenltich auf der jeweiligen Analyse, niich im abschliessenden Service Request. Ausserdem sollte eine Anzahl bei der Analyse möglich sein. Wir denken da an die Bestellung von Blutkonserven.

Beat Heggli

@lpg-tech lpg-tech added Final review @eHS eHealth Suisse must approve Request of feature useful extensions that can be implemented in later versions labels Jan 20, 2022
@lpg-tech lpg-tech added this to the STU 2 milestone Jan 20, 2022
@PeroGrgic PeroGrgic removed the Final review @eHS eHealth Suisse must approve label Jan 31, 2022
@lpg-tech
Copy link
Collaborator

lpg-tech commented Jun 21, 2023

Völlig einverstanden. Das macht aber erst Sinn wenn wir einen LabCatalog integrieren. Dort wird die Art des Materials gegeben (extenstion in PlanDefinition: specimen requested)
http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/fhir-order-catalog/exlabservices.html
Text from Changelog:
Relation between Tests and Specimens my be needed. The relation should be established by a test-specific PlanDefinition as extension specimenRequested, which points to the test-specific SpecimenDefinition. The test-specific PlanDefinition and SpecimenDefinitin should be provided by a LabCatalog/Compendium. So the Lab Organization can independently define their tests with all the needed preanalytic conditions.

Concerns : Issue #260

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Request of feature useful extensions that can be implemented in later versions STU 1 Ballot
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants