Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CH LAB-Order Composition (Simon Walther, Corina von Känel, CISTEC AG) #89

Closed
ig-feedback opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

CH LAB-Order Composition (Simon Walther, Corina von Känel, CISTEC AG) #89

ig-feedback opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Final review @eHS eHealth Suisse must approve STU 1 Ballot

Comments

@ig-feedback
Copy link
Collaborator

ch.fhir.ig.ch-lab-order#0.1.0 /StructureDefinition-ch-lab-order-composition.html

Verwendung von Snomed und LOINC für die Beschreibungen von Analysen, Specimen, Entnahmestellen usw. Auch für Gruppierungen sollten keine Freitexte verwendet werden.
Zum Teil wird schon Snomed und LOINC verwendet, aber nicht überall wo das möglich ist.

Simon Walther, Corina von Känel, CISTEC AG
@lpg-tech
Copy link
Collaborator

lpg-tech commented Nov 3, 2021 •
edited

Gruppierung der Analysen dürfte wohl mit den Lab Specialties die beste Abdeckung haben: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.3.3.2.1.
Ist im Beispiel 0-generic-of-ChOrf-Questionnaire umgesetzt.
In den Specimen-Beispielen ergänzt.

@lpg-tech lpg-tech added the Final review @eHS eHealth Suisse must approve label Dec 13, 2021
@PeroGrgic
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue reviewed and closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Final review @eHS eHealth Suisse must approve STU 1 Ballot
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@oliveregger @lpg-tech @ig-feedback @PeroGrgic