You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems the current implementation of gRim::stepwise.iModel() only supports starting model-selection from a full main effects model gRim::dmod(~.^1, data = data) if one wants to include all the variables in the selection procedure.
Is there any theoretical reason for this? In other words, couldn't we just as well start from log p(i) = mu and let AIC do the variable selection?
Reason I ask is that starting from a full main effects model limits model selection to low dimensional contingency tables. (e.g. table() will not work on data.frames with more than 31 binary columns since the amount of cells explodes to 2^31.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems the current implementation of
gRim::stepwise.iModel()
only supports starting model-selection from a full main effects modelgRim::dmod(~.^1, data = data)
if one wants to include all the variables in the selection procedure.Is there any theoretical reason for this? In other words, couldn't we just as well start from log p(i) = mu and let AIC do the variable selection?
Reason I ask is that starting from a full main effects model limits model selection to low dimensional contingency tables. (e.g.
table()
will not work on data.frames with more than 31 binary columns since the amount of cells explodes to 2^31.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: