Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions for alternative names #68

Closed
jleclanche opened this issue Nov 28, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

Suggestions for alternative names #68

jleclanche opened this issue Nov 28, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@jleclanche
Copy link
Contributor

Packaging this project is a bit of a pain due to another app with the same name:
http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/spark/

In such cases, what do you suggest the project should be named? spark-lines? sparklines? shell-spark?

@holman
Copy link
Owner

holman commented Nov 28, 2013

best-spark-ever

@jleclanche
Copy link
Contributor Author

Heh. :)

I wanted to go with sparklines but get upstream blessing first. Input appreciated.

@holman
Copy link
Owner

holman commented Nov 28, 2013

:) I think if there's a conflict I'd go with spark-shell.

@jleclanche
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok. What about potential binary name conflict? should it also be /usr/bin/spark-shell?

@holman
Copy link
Owner

holman commented Nov 28, 2013

I think I'm cool with that. Or maybe spark.sh. I'm at dinner and I've had a lot of wine so I reserve judgement on this a bit.

@ncanceill
Copy link
Contributor

In this spirit of combining "spark" and "shell", I humbly suggest shpark.

@JeffAbrahamson
Copy link
Contributor

sparkline or spark-line (singular or plural) seems more descriptive.
In case descriptive is among the criteria. ;-)

@holman
Copy link
Owner

holman commented Feb 20, 2014

:)

Going to close this out, since there's nothing to do on spark's end now.

@holman holman closed this as completed Feb 20, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants