New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
develo Home Network - fails setup, keeps initializing #100310
Comments
Hey there @2Fake, @Shutgun, mind taking a look at this issue as it has been labeled with an integration ( Code owner commandsCode owners of
(message by CodeOwnersMention) devolo_home_network documentation |
Hi @JeroenTuinstra , I'm experiencing the same thing, but up to know I suspected the firmware I'm running because devolo provides Alpha firmware to me for testing purposes. However, I see that you are running the GA firmware, so that can't be the reason. Interestingly, nothing changed in my scope on HA's side from 2023.9.1 to 2023.9.2, so I assume that the issue exists since 2023.9.0. In that version, new entities were added. So I plan to do the following:
btw: rebooting the devolo device always helped me, I never had to delete the integration from HA. Maybe reloading the integration after rebooting is also enough. |
@Shutgun Thank you very much for looking into this. It indeed started around 2023.9.0. I noticed the continual disconnection when it was 2023.9.1, and when it updated to 2023.9.2 (I have automatic updates ... I know), devolo was the one integration that refused to come back online. In the meantime they are back online, but response seems to be very slow and the it gives the same errors as in #100310 Unfortunately it seems to all come as a perfect storm. Fritz!Box's new OS no longer shows roaming devices as online when they connect through the devolo Home Network. So bascially I can no longer have 1 source for device tracking but have to add the device trackers of the Powerlines. When they also stop working, Home Assistant basically thinks nobody is at home, unless you are connected straight to the Fritz!Box. I'll disable some not used entities and see whether it is working better. Thanks again for looking into this and for the speedy answer. |
Same here, first seen with HA 2023.9.1 after a reboot |
I identified the root cause. If I put HA aside and query the device directly with a bigger timeout, the UpdateFirmwareCheck endpoint answers with UNKNOWN_ERROR. But as the normal timeout isn't that big I raise assuming the device is offline. This leads to a three steps solution:
|
Hi @JeroenTuinstra and @bosco688 , with 2023.9.3 the issue seems to be much better, but not completely gone. Since I cannot tell for sure, that I'm not seeing a different issue: could you check your setups? |
I've enabled on one powerline all the entities again and I will monitor it. So far it seems it remains online. Is it enough to enable all entities on one of them or should it be done on all of them. |
A single device should be enough. If the device tends to go offline again, could you tell me, which entities you enabled? |
The problem
I have a set of Magic 2 Wifi Powerlines from Develo Home Network. They are no longer loading in but keep initializing with the error: "Failed setup, will retry".
This started with the latest version of Home Assistant: 2023.9.2. Nothing is mentioned in the log files of Home Assistant. So there is no clue as to why the initializing is failing.
Have already deleted all devices and rebooted them.
What version of Home Assistant Core has the issue?
core-2023.9.2
What was the last working version of Home Assistant Core?
core-2023.9.1
What type of installation are you running?
Home Assistant Container
Integration causing the issue
devolo Home Network
Link to integration documentation on our website
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/devolo_home_network
Diagnostics information
home-assistant_devolo_home_network_2023-09-13T15-54-48.084Z.log
Example YAML snippet
No response
Anything in the logs that might be useful for us?
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: