Install gems automatically on newer Ruby #15955
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bo98
force-pushed
the
newer-ruby-bootstrap
branch
from
22b86e5
to
93fc26f
Compare
MikeMcQuaid
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2023
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
Bo98
force-pushed
the
newer-ruby-bootstrap
branch
from
93fc26f
to
afc9572
Compare
MikeMcQuaid
approved these changes
Sep 28, 2023
Bo98
force-pushed
the
newer-ruby-bootstrap
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5311f1c
to
e88a768
Compare
Bo98
force-pushed
the
newer-ruby-bootstrap
branch
from
e88a768
to
daa49a1
Compare
|
Thanks @Bo98! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Untested but should hopefully work.
Target is to make this as painless as possible (e.g. a few seconds, only a basic Ruby is needed with no strings attached). Otherwise I'd rather just do symlink magic instead or just go ahead vendor given we're going to do so within the next couple months anyway.
Draft because untested and also requires all the other PRs.