Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

icc can't compile std::vector with GCC 5.x headers #2100

Closed
jas02 opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

icc can't compile std::vector with GCC 5.x headers #2100

jas02 opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jas02
Copy link
Contributor

jas02 commented Oct 29, 2015

Hi,

from Intel icc 2015.3 to current 2016.0.109 there is problem with GCC 5.x headers.

Please see https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/565143

Problem won't be probably fixed so fast, because is present for some time now, without fix or workaround.

Please do not create new Intel toolchain 2016.00 with GCC 5.2.0 headers, but with 4.9.3 instead.

Easyconfigs are in PR #1973 .

@wpoely86
Copy link
Member

@jas02 thanks for letting us know. We will keep an eye on this.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Dec 13, 2015

seems like it's still a problem, even with icc 16.0.1...

"number one priority", they said...

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

It seems like this problem is fixed in the new 2016.2.181 release, cfr. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-parallel-studio-xe-2016-composer-edition-compilers-fixes-list (look for DPD200365668).

So, do we use GCC 5.3.0 in intel/2016.02 (cfr. #2523)?

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: v2.8.0, v2.7.0 Mar 11, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 14, 2016

Other potential issues with GCC 5.x are being uncovered (not related to Intel, but I figured I should mention it here too), cfr. openhpc/ohpc#207

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 14, 2016

closing this, as we now have versions of the intel toolchain on top of GCC 5.3, cfr. #2523 and #3009

@boegel boegel closed this as completed May 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants