Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ncdf4 - netcdf4 for R 3.1.1 intel2014b #1185

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 3, 2015

Conversation

hajgato
Copy link
Collaborator

@hajgato hajgato commented Nov 5, 2014

No description provided.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 13, 2014

Jenkins: ok to test

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 31, 2015

Jenkins: test this please

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3181/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3181/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 31, 2015

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/a59a6c2918598eebb683 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 31, 2015

Missing dependency on cURL?

ld: cannot find -lcurl

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3219/
Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3219/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.


dependencies = [
(r, rver),
('netCDF', '4.3.2')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

syntax error: missing trailing ,

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3226/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3226/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@hajgato
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hajgato commented Jun 3, 2015

@boegel: commas corrected

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/bb10906e3072ac495262 for a full test report.

edit: failed due to outdated easyblocks branch being used

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/2742541fecde0d688214 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Going in, thanks @hajgato!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2015
ncdf4 - netcdf4 for R 3.1.1 intel2014b
@boegel boegel merged commit 0900294 into easybuilders:develop Jun 3, 2015
@hajgato hajgato deleted the ncdf_upgrade branch October 9, 2015 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants