New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{bio,devel} [foss/2015a] Cufflinks 2.2.1 (REVIEW) #1351
Conversation
Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this? |
# issues with boost > 1.55, see https://github.com/cole-trapnell-lab/cufflinks/issues/3 | ||
('Boost', '1.55.0', '-Python-2.7.9'), | ||
('SAMtools', '0.1.19'), | ||
('Eigen', '3.2.3'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3.2.4?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm just sticking with the same version as intel-2015a, we could move them both forward if it makes sense...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, let's stick with 3.2.3
.
ok to test |
Test PASSed. |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
# issues with boost > 1.55, see https://github.com/cole-trapnell-lab/cufflinks/issues/3 | ||
('Boost', '1.51.0', '-Python-2.7.3'), | ||
('SAMtools', '0.1.18'), | ||
('Eigen', '3.1.1'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these versions are quite different from the ones in the foss/2015a
easyconfig?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are consistent with the versions for goolf-1.4.10 and tied to version of samtools used in tophat (and deps there).
I had a user recently load both the foss-2015a version of cufflinks and the goolf-1.4.10 version of tophat and have trouble.
And before you ask, tophat can't be compiled against GCC-4.9 (yet?)...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We usually keep dependency versions consistent across easyconfigs for the same software version (Cufflinks), across toolchains...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The deps in the foss/2015a
easyconfig contributed here match the ones in the existing one for intel/2015a
, so just align them accordingly here too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW: try and keep your users from mixing toolchains, that's a big bag of worms...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'll just kick the 1.4.10 version out since it isn't high priority
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
removed a commit |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
Test report by @rjeschmi |
Test report by @rjeschmi |
The second report includes everything that is on top of the base foss-2015a install (which is why it is a bit bigger). |
@boegel I'm pretty sure all the URLs got fixed earlier this year: https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/1335/files |
Jenkins: test this please |
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
Test report by @boegel |
{bio,devel} [foss/2015a] Cufflinks 2.2.1 (REVIEW)
No description provided.