{data} [foss-2014b] Netcdf C, C++, Fortran (REVIEW)

[hajgato]

No description provided.

[hpcugentbot]

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

[boegel]

Jenkins: ok to test

[hpcugentbot]

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3186/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3186/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[boegel]

@rjeschmi: up for retesting this? You submitted a failed test report at some point.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 13 out of 13 (13 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/e6c66128158fb5d3ee5b for a full test report.

[boegel]

@hajgato: please sync with current develop, and also apply the patch in the netCDF 4.3.2 easyconfig that uses foss/2015a

Looks good to go otherwise.

[hajgato]

@boegel synced with current develop, foss/2015a version updated

[hpcugentbot]

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3249/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3249/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 14 out of 14 (14 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/8a6812940b1501631d6b for a full test report.

[boegel]

Looking great, merging it, thanks @hajgato!